Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1481 to 1500 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A show cause notice for cancellation of charitable trust registration was valid where it referred to the search, survey, violations of the trust deed, misuse of the trust, and assessment findings; the trust's detailed reply showed adequate notice and opportunity to respond, and the Tribunal erred in treating the allegations as vague or isolating the Managing Trustee's conduct from the trust's misuse. The Court also held that the amended power to cancel registration could be invoked against a trust registered earlier, but the cancellation could not operate retrospectively from the original date of registration. The cancellation was upheld, but confined to the date of the cancellation order.
A show cause notice for cancellation of charitable trust registration was valid where it referred to the search, survey, violations of the trust deed, misuse of the trust, and assessment findings; the trust's detailed reply showed adequate notice and opportunity to respond, and the Tribunal erred in treating the allegations as vague or isolating the Managing Trustee's conduct from the trust's misuse. The Court also held that the amended power to cancel registration could be invoked against a trust registered earlier, but the cancellation could not operate retrospectively from the original date of registration. The cancellation was upheld, but confined to the date of the cancellation order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.