Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A show cause notice for cancellation of charitable trust registration was valid where it referred to the search, survey, violations of the trust deed, misuse of the trust, and assessment findings; the trust's detailed reply showed adequate notice and opportunity to respond, and the Tribunal erred in treating the allegations as vague or isolating the Managing Trustee's conduct from the trust's misuse. The Court also held that the amended power to cancel registration could be invoked against a trust registered earlier, but the cancellation could not operate retrospectively from the original date of registration. The cancellation was upheld, but confined to the date of the cancellation order.
A show cause notice for cancellation of charitable trust registration was valid where it referred to the search, survey, violations of the trust deed, misuse of the trust, and assessment findings; the trust's detailed reply showed adequate notice and opportunity to respond, and the Tribunal erred in treating the allegations as vague or isolating the Managing Trustee's conduct from the trust's misuse. The Court also held that the amended power to cancel registration could be invoked against a trust registered earlier, but the cancellation could not operate retrospectively from the original date of registration. The cancellation was upheld, but confined to the date of the cancellation order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.