Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Payments made by a sister concern towards software testing and development, and adjusted against the assessee's business bills, were held not to constitute deemed dividend. The Court relied on concurrent factual findings that the transactions arose in the regular course of business, and the Revenue failed to rebut that position. Trade advances and commercial payments that are neither loans nor advances within the meaning of the provision fall outside deemed dividend treatment under section 2(22)(e). The questions of law were answered in favour of the assessee and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Payments made by a sister concern towards software testing and development, and adjusted against the assessee's business bills, were held not to constitute deemed dividend. The Court relied on concurrent factual findings that the transactions arose in the regular course of business, and the Revenue failed to rebut that position. Trade advances and commercial payments that are neither loans nor advances within the meaning of the provision fall outside deemed dividend treatment under section 2(22)(e). The questions of law were answered in favour of the assessee and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
