Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Deduction under section 80G was allowed for donations forming part of CSR expenditure because disallowance under Explanation 2 to section 37(1) did not itself bar the section 80G claim. The enhanced deduction claim under section 80-IA was not decided on merits and was remanded to the AO for verification of revised evidence and supporting material. On the transfer pricing issue, working capital adjustment was directed to be granted while re-examining receivables from associated enterprises. Computation of income, section 80M deduction, and interest under sections 244A and 234C were also restored for fresh consideration, and the challenge to penalty initiation was dismissed as premature. The appeal was partly allowed.
Deduction under section 80G was allowed for donations forming part of CSR expenditure because disallowance under Explanation 2 to section 37(1) did not itself bar the section 80G claim. The enhanced deduction claim under section 80-IA was not decided on merits and was remanded to the AO for verification of revised evidence and supporting material. On the transfer pricing issue, working capital adjustment was directed to be granted while re-examining receivables from associated enterprises. Computation of income, section 80M deduction, and interest under sections 244A and 234C were also restored for fresh consideration, and the challenge to penalty initiation was dismissed as premature. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.