Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Deduction under section 80G was allowed for donations forming part of CSR expenditure because disallowance under Explanation 2 to section 37(1) did not itself bar the section 80G claim. The enhanced deduction claim under section 80-IA was not decided on merits and was remanded to the AO for verification of revised evidence and supporting material. On the transfer pricing issue, working capital adjustment was directed to be granted while re-examining receivables from associated enterprises. Computation of income, section 80M deduction, and interest under sections 244A and 234C were also restored for fresh consideration, and the challenge to penalty initiation was dismissed as premature. The appeal was partly allowed.
Deduction under section 80G was allowed for donations forming part of CSR expenditure because disallowance under Explanation 2 to section 37(1) did not itself bar the section 80G claim. The enhanced deduction claim under section 80-IA was not decided on merits and was remanded to the AO for verification of revised evidence and supporting material. On the transfer pricing issue, working capital adjustment was directed to be granted while re-examining receivables from associated enterprises. Computation of income, section 80M deduction, and interest under sections 244A and 234C were also restored for fresh consideration, and the challenge to penalty initiation was dismissed as premature. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.