Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5681 to 5700 of 96207 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction under section 80G was allowed for donations forming part of CSR expenditure because disallowance under Explanation 2 to section 37(1) did not itself bar the section 80G claim. The enhanced deduction claim under section 80-IA was not decided on merits and was remanded to the AO for verification of revised evidence and supporting material. On the transfer pricing issue, working capital adjustment was directed to be granted while re-examining receivables from associated enterprises. Computation of income, section 80M deduction, and interest under sections 244A and 234C were also restored for fresh consideration, and the challenge to penalty initiation was dismissed as premature. The appeal was partly allowed.
Deduction under section 80G was allowed for donations forming part of CSR expenditure because disallowance under Explanation 2 to section 37(1) did not itself bar the section 80G claim. The enhanced deduction claim under section 80-IA was not decided on merits and was remanded to the AO for verification of revised evidence and supporting material. On the transfer pricing issue, working capital adjustment was directed to be granted while re-examining receivables from associated enterprises. Computation of income, section 80M deduction, and interest under sections 244A and 234C were also restored for fresh consideration, and the challenge to penalty initiation was dismissed as premature. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.