Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TNMM was accepted for intra-group management fees and technology and trademark licence fees because the same transactions had been treated as interlinked in earlier and subsequent years, with no change in functions, assets or risks shown and evidence of services and business benefit on record; the CUP-based nil valuation was therefore unsustainable and the transfer pricing adjustments were deleted. SAP implementation cost was also treated as a reasonable, scientific allocation for IT support services because the services were used daily, billed by actual user headcount, and the need and rendition tests were satisfied; the nil ALP adjustment was deleted. The disallowance of employees' contribution to Provident Fund and ESIC was sustained under the Supreme Court ruling in Checkmate Service Private Limited.
TNMM was accepted for intra-group management fees and technology and trademark licence fees because the same transactions had been treated as interlinked in earlier and subsequent years, with no change in functions, assets or risks shown and evidence of services and business benefit on record; the CUP-based nil valuation was therefore unsustainable and the transfer pricing adjustments were deleted. SAP implementation cost was also treated as a reasonable, scientific allocation for IT support services because the services were used daily, billed by actual user headcount, and the need and rendition tests were satisfied; the nil ALP adjustment was deleted. The disallowance of employees' contribution to Provident Fund and ESIC was sustained under the Supreme Court ruling in Checkmate Service Private Limited.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.