Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5561 to 5580 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Omission of clause (i) of section 92BA was treated as having retrospective effect, so the reference to the TPO and the transfer pricing adjustment based on specified domestic transactions was held invalid and deleted. Brokerage paid in the ordinary course of a leasing business was allowed under section 37(1) to the extent supported by invoices and tenant details, while the balance was remitted for verification. Receipts such as car parking income, interest on fixed deposits, permission charges and licence fee were held to have a direct nexus with SEZ business and were treated as eligible for deduction under section 80IAB, making their reclassification as income from other sources unsustainable.
Omission of clause (i) of section 92BA was treated as having retrospective effect, so the reference to the TPO and the transfer pricing adjustment based on specified domestic transactions was held invalid and deleted. Brokerage paid in the ordinary course of a leasing business was allowed under section 37(1) to the extent supported by invoices and tenant details, while the balance was remitted for verification. Receipts such as car parking income, interest on fixed deposits, permission charges and licence fee were held to have a direct nexus with SEZ business and were treated as eligible for deduction under section 80IAB, making their reclassification as income from other sources unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.