Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The NCLAT held that, under the approved resolution plan and insolvency framework, the power to admit or re-determine claims vested in the resolution professional, not the successful resolution applicant, and the applicant's right to further verification had lapsed after the stipulated 60-day period. Admitted homebuyer claims supported by payment records, creditor-list inclusion and allotment documents could not be reopened belatedly to defeat implementation of the plan. The Tribunal set aside the direction for fresh scrutiny, ordered allotment of the flats and possession in terms of the allotment letters and builder-buyer agreements on payment of the differential amount, and directed IBBI inquiry into alleged fraud and systemic issues.
The NCLAT held that, under the approved resolution plan and insolvency framework, the power to admit or re-determine claims vested in the resolution professional, not the successful resolution applicant, and the applicant's right to further verification had lapsed after the stipulated 60-day period. Admitted homebuyer claims supported by payment records, creditor-list inclusion and allotment documents could not be reopened belatedly to defeat implementation of the plan. The Tribunal set aside the direction for fresh scrutiny, ordered allotment of the flats and possession in terms of the allotment letters and builder-buyer agreements on payment of the differential amount, and directed IBBI inquiry into alleged fraud and systemic issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.