Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1481 to 1500 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provisional attachment of a bank account under GST was discussed in the context of alleged incorrect reporting of tax liability and excess input tax credit in GSTR-9. The Court noted that the petitioner had neither filed a reply to the show cause notice nor been granted a personal hearing, and treated the right to be heard as part of natural justice. Relief was balanced by requiring deposit of the entire demand before setting aside the adjudication order and allowing fresh reply and hearing. The consequential recovery measures and bank attachment were directed to be lifted, with merits left open for de novo adjudication.
Provisional attachment of a bank account under GST was discussed in the context of alleged incorrect reporting of tax liability and excess input tax credit in GSTR-9. The Court noted that the petitioner had neither filed a reply to the show cause notice nor been granted a personal hearing, and treated the right to be heard as part of natural justice. Relief was balanced by requiring deposit of the entire demand before setting aside the adjudication order and allowing fresh reply and hearing. The consequential recovery measures and bank attachment were directed to be lifted, with merits left open for de novo adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.