Genuineness of investment evidence determines LTCG entitlement; non specific regulatory reports cannot displace transaction specific documentary proof...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5881 to 5900 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provisional attachment of a bank account under GST was discussed in the context of alleged incorrect reporting of tax liability and excess input tax credit in GSTR-9. The Court noted that the petitioner had neither filed a reply to the show cause notice nor been granted a personal hearing, and treated the right to be heard as part of natural justice. Relief was balanced by requiring deposit of the entire demand before setting aside the adjudication order and allowing fresh reply and hearing. The consequential recovery measures and bank attachment were directed to be lifted, with merits left open for de novo adjudication.
Provisional attachment of a bank account under GST was discussed in the context of alleged incorrect reporting of tax liability and excess input tax credit in GSTR-9. The Court noted that the petitioner had neither filed a reply to the show cause notice nor been granted a personal hearing, and treated the right to be heard as part of natural justice. Relief was balanced by requiring deposit of the entire demand before setting aside the adjudication order and allowing fresh reply and hearing. The consequential recovery measures and bank attachment were directed to be lifted, with merits left open for de novo adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
