Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Where a civil court had already declared the registered sale deed void for fraud and non-payment of consideration, no capital gain could be attributed to the assessee merely because the Revenue's appeal against that decree was pending. The ITAT noted that the Assessing Officer made no inquiry with the purchasers about payment of consideration or the source of investment, and no material showed that any sale proceeds were actually received by the assessee. On these facts, a valid transfer and receipt of consideration were absent, so no long-term capital gain arose even on a protective basis. The protective addition was deleted.
Where a civil court had already declared the registered sale deed void for fraud and non-payment of consideration, no capital gain could be attributed to the assessee merely because the Revenue's appeal against that decree was pending. The ITAT noted that the Assessing Officer made no inquiry with the purchasers about payment of consideration or the source of investment, and no material showed that any sale proceeds were actually received by the assessee. On these facts, a valid transfer and receipt of consideration were absent, so no long-term capital gain arose even on a protective basis. The protective addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
