Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
ITAT held that accumulation of income validly made by a charitable trust in A.Y. 2017-18 could be applied in A.Y. 2023-24, because the law then permitted utilisation within five years and in the immediately succeeding year. The Finance Act, 2022 amendment to section 11(3) was treated as prospective and incapable of extinguishing an already accrued right of utilisation. The Tribunal also noted that the timing of the amendment left no practical opportunity to comply with the shortened period, and a law cannot require performance of an impossible act. The addition under section 11(3) was deleted and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
ITAT held that accumulation of income validly made by a charitable trust in A.Y. 2017-18 could be applied in A.Y. 2023-24, because the law then permitted utilisation within five years and in the immediately succeeding year. The Finance Act, 2022 amendment to section 11(3) was treated as prospective and incapable of extinguishing an already accrued right of utilisation. The Tribunal also noted that the timing of the amendment left no practical opportunity to comply with the shortened period, and a law cannot require performance of an impossible act. The addition under section 11(3) was deleted and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.