Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6361 to 6380 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that accumulation of income validly made by a charitable trust in A.Y. 2017-18 could be applied in A.Y. 2023-24, because the law then permitted utilisation within five years and in the immediately succeeding year. The Finance Act, 2022 amendment to section 11(3) was treated as prospective and incapable of extinguishing an already accrued right of utilisation. The Tribunal also noted that the timing of the amendment left no practical opportunity to comply with the shortened period, and a law cannot require performance of an impossible act. The addition under section 11(3) was deleted and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
ITAT held that accumulation of income validly made by a charitable trust in A.Y. 2017-18 could be applied in A.Y. 2023-24, because the law then permitted utilisation within five years and in the immediately succeeding year. The Finance Act, 2022 amendment to section 11(3) was treated as prospective and incapable of extinguishing an already accrued right of utilisation. The Tribunal also noted that the timing of the amendment left no practical opportunity to comply with the shortened period, and a law cannot require performance of an impossible act. The addition under section 11(3) was deleted and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.