Donor-directed corpus contributions retain capital character despite exemption claims under section 10(23C)(vi), preventing their treatment as taxable...
Enhanced tax-audit threshold applies where banking records establish compliant non-cash receipts and payments, eliminating penalty exposure for audit ...
Transfer pricing consistency protects identical non-interest-bearing debenture terms from a later notional-interest adjustment without valid statutory...
Rectification of debatable deduction claims cannot reverse scrutiny-approved co-operative society interest income deductions as apparent record errors...
Cash-method accounting bars presumptive interest taxation, while unsupported securities and share-trading additions require reliable material and veri...
Section 7 admission requires established financial debt and default, not precise interest quantification, while post-suspension defaults remain action...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96508 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that accumulation of income validly made by a charitable trust in A.Y. 2017-18 could be applied in A.Y. 2023-24, because the law then permitted utilisation within five years and in the immediately succeeding year. The Finance Act, 2022 amendment to section 11(3) was treated as prospective and incapable of extinguishing an already accrued right of utilisation. The Tribunal also noted that the timing of the amendment left no practical opportunity to comply with the shortened period, and a law cannot require performance of an impossible act. The addition under section 11(3) was deleted and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
ITAT held that accumulation of income validly made by a charitable trust in A.Y. 2017-18 could be applied in A.Y. 2023-24, because the law then permitted utilisation within five years and in the immediately succeeding year. The Finance Act, 2022 amendment to section 11(3) was treated as prospective and incapable of extinguishing an already accrued right of utilisation. The Tribunal also noted that the timing of the amendment left no practical opportunity to comply with the shortened period, and a law cannot require performance of an impossible act. The addition under section 11(3) was deleted and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.