Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6361 to 6380 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A second final assessment order for the same assessment year was held impermissible because a final order had already been passed pursuant to DRP directions; the later order was quashed as a duplicate assessment. Transfer pricing issues on intra-group services and royalty benchmarking were not finally decided and were remitted to the TPO for fresh adjudication and computation in line with earlier-year directions. Support service expenditure was held allowable on consistency with prior years, and the disallowance was deleted. Amortization of telecom licence fee and the related interest claim were sent back for consequential action in accordance with law. Deduction under section 80G for CSR expenditure, refund of excess dividend distribution tax at treaty rate, and road tax and VAT on leased assets were all allowed.
A second final assessment order for the same assessment year was held impermissible because a final order had already been passed pursuant to DRP directions; the later order was quashed as a duplicate assessment. Transfer pricing issues on intra-group services and royalty benchmarking were not finally decided and were remitted to the TPO for fresh adjudication and computation in line with earlier-year directions. Support service expenditure was held allowable on consistency with prior years, and the disallowance was deleted. Amortization of telecom licence fee and the related interest claim were sent back for consequential action in accordance with law. Deduction under section 80G for CSR expenditure, refund of excess dividend distribution tax at treaty rate, and road tax and VAT on leased assets were all allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.