Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Registered sale deed and banking evidence supported capital gains reinvestment claim; unexplained money additions were deleted.
    Unsigned transfer pricing order held non est in law, leading to quashing of the assessments.
    ITAT on revenue recognition, notional interest, and business deductions: verified claims, no exempt-income disallowance, and selective remands.
    Invalid scrutiny notice, earlier transfer of property, and mercantile accrual rule led ITAT to delete additions and quash assessment.
    Agricultural income from leased land, genuine trade liabilities, and no cessation of liability were upheld in this tax dispute.
    Section 80P business attribution: ITAT allows deduction on investment interest and ancillary receipts, but excludes staff-loan and other non-eligible ...
    Business expenditure on discontinued operations allowed despite slump sale valuation having no bearing on section 37(1) deductibility.
    Weighted deduction for donation to approved research institution sustained despite unproven allegations of donee-side fraud
    IGST classification and limitation: residual entry demand fails where self-assessment was not challenged and suppression was not proved.
    High Seas Sale of Technical Grade Urea through State Trading Enterprise did not justify confiscation or penalty.
    Repeated default and statutory adjournment limits justified dismissal for non-prosecution under tribunal procedure rules.
    Fraudulent CIRP allegations need specific material; Section 65 cannot reopen admitted debt and default findings.
    Pre-existing dispute defeats insolvency claim where wage dues remain under labour and court proceedings.
    Binding resolution plan and perjury threshold: tribunal upholds rejection of falsehood claims and costs for frivolous reopening attempts.
    Invoice-stipulated interest cannot inflate operational debt without mutual acceptance; disputed interest claim defeats Section 9 insolvency admission.
    Equivalent-value attachment under the PMLA upheld for untraceable proceeds of crime, with burden on noticee to disprove tainted character.
    Composite works contract taxability and binding prior decision in assessee's own case led to service tax demand being set aside.
    Unjust enrichment and works contract taxability defeated refund claims; refund proceedings cannot reopen unchallenged self-assessments.
    CCSP approval suspended immediately, while existing cargo may still be cleared after due process.
    E-waste disposal notice invites quotations from registered recyclers for lawful incineration and handling of seized electronics
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Penal liability under Sections 114(iii) and 114AA requires...

      Penal liability for fraudulent export overvaluation requires concrete proof of knowing involvement, not suspicion or unsubstantiated linkage.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      CustomsApril 23, 2026Case LawsAT
      Penal liability under Sections 114(iii) and 114AA requires direct and concrete proof of knowing involvement in the fraudulent export activity; suspicion, assumption, or merely suggestive material is insufficient. The Tribunal found no evidence linking the appellant, who was not the Customs Broker for the exports, to the consignments or to any inflated valuation, and held that provision of contact details or documents to another person did not by itself establish a premeditated role in wrongful IGST refund facilitation. The penalties were set aside.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax