Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6321 to 6340 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imported marketing services received from abroad were held taxable under reverse charge where the appellant had already admitted the commission-based service tax liability and paid tax with interest before notice, so that demand was sustained. Separate bonus payments under a share purchase agreement were treated as consideration for continued marketing and business promotion services, not as part of the share purchase price, because they were contingent on managerial performance and turnover conditions; that demand was also upheld as Business Auxiliary Service. The Tribunal further found suppression of facts from the department, so the extended period of limitation applied. Penalty under Section 78 was reduced to the amount relating to the bonus payment demand, and penalty under Section 77 was set aside.
Imported marketing services received from abroad were held taxable under reverse charge where the appellant had already admitted the commission-based service tax liability and paid tax with interest before notice, so that demand was sustained. Separate bonus payments under a share purchase agreement were treated as consideration for continued marketing and business promotion services, not as part of the share purchase price, because they were contingent on managerial performance and turnover conditions; that demand was also upheld as Business Auxiliary Service. The Tribunal further found suppression of facts from the department, so the extended period of limitation applied. Penalty under Section 78 was reduced to the amount relating to the bonus payment demand, and penalty under Section 77 was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.