Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Refund of unutilized input tax credit under an inverted duty structure had to be reconsidered by the competent authority in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Union of India v. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd., which upheld the restriction of refund under Rule 89(5) to input goods and excluded input services from Net ITC. The High Court did not examine the petitioner's computation on merits, as the refund issue was to be freshly decided under the settled legal position. If the authority disagreed with the petitioner's computation, it was directed to pass a speaking order giving specific reasons expeditiously.
Refund of unutilized input tax credit under an inverted duty structure had to be reconsidered by the competent authority in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Union of India v. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd., which upheld the restriction of refund under Rule 89(5) to input goods and excluded input services from Net ITC. The High Court did not examine the petitioner's computation on merits, as the refund issue was to be freshly decided under the settled legal position. If the authority disagreed with the petitioner's computation, it was directed to pass a speaking order giving specific reasons expeditiously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
