Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Refund of unutilized input tax credit under an inverted duty structure had to be reconsidered by the competent authority in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Union of India v. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd., which upheld the restriction of refund under Rule 89(5) to input goods and excluded input services from Net ITC. The High Court did not examine the petitioner's computation on merits, as the refund issue was to be freshly decided under the settled legal position. If the authority disagreed with the petitioner's computation, it was directed to pass a speaking order giving specific reasons expeditiously.
Refund of unutilized input tax credit under an inverted duty structure had to be reconsidered by the competent authority in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Union of India v. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd., which upheld the restriction of refund under Rule 89(5) to input goods and excluded input services from Net ITC. The High Court did not examine the petitioner's computation on merits, as the refund issue was to be freshly decided under the settled legal position. If the authority disagreed with the petitioner's computation, it was directed to pass a speaking order giving specific reasons expeditiously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
