Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Parallel Central GST adjudication could not be sustained where the same suppliers, the same alleged fake or non-existent status, and the same ITC disallowance for the same periods had already been adjudicated by the State GST Authority. Applying the principle against overlapping jurisdiction and duplicate proceedings on the same subject matter, the Court held that the later Central adjudication was unsustainable and set it aside. The Court declined to examine other issues and disposed of the connected applications accordingly.
Parallel Central GST adjudication could not be sustained where the same suppliers, the same alleged fake or non-existent status, and the same ITC disallowance for the same periods had already been adjudicated by the State GST Authority. Applying the principle against overlapping jurisdiction and duplicate proceedings on the same subject matter, the Court held that the later Central adjudication was unsustainable and set it aside. The Court declined to examine other issues and disposed of the connected applications accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
