Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Parallel Central GST adjudication could not be sustained where the same suppliers, the same alleged fake or non-existent status, and the same ITC disallowance for the same periods had already been adjudicated by the State GST Authority. Applying the principle against overlapping jurisdiction and duplicate proceedings on the same subject matter, the Court held that the later Central adjudication was unsustainable and set it aside. The Court declined to examine other issues and disposed of the connected applications accordingly.
Parallel Central GST adjudication could not be sustained where the same suppliers, the same alleged fake or non-existent status, and the same ITC disallowance for the same periods had already been adjudicated by the State GST Authority. Applying the principle against overlapping jurisdiction and duplicate proceedings on the same subject matter, the Court held that the later Central adjudication was unsustainable and set it aside. The Court declined to examine other issues and disposed of the connected applications accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
