Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Belated statutory appeals under GST may still be entertained conditionally where the court exercises discretion despite expiry of limitation. The text explains that the writ challenge was not accepted on merits because the petitioner had not used the statutory reduced-penalty amnesty and had approached the court after the appeal period had lapsed. Even so, the court granted liberty to file an appeal within the time fixed, subject to pre-deposit of 25% of the disputed tax. On compliance, the appellate authority was directed to hear the appeal on merits, adjust any amount already recovered toward the pre-deposit, and lift bank attachment if applicable.
Belated statutory appeals under GST may still be entertained conditionally where the court exercises discretion despite expiry of limitation. The text explains that the writ challenge was not accepted on merits because the petitioner had not used the statutory reduced-penalty amnesty and had approached the court after the appeal period had lapsed. Even so, the court granted liberty to file an appeal within the time fixed, subject to pre-deposit of 25% of the disputed tax. On compliance, the appellate authority was directed to hear the appeal on merits, adjust any amount already recovered toward the pre-deposit, and lift bank attachment if applicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.