Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Where liability to incur construction expenditure had already accrued under the business transaction, the Court applied the mercantile system and the Calcutta Company principle to allow deduction of the estimated expense on accrual basis; the concurrent finding permitting the construction deduction was upheld. In the sale-and-lease-back arrangement involving cinematographic rights, title had passed to the assessee and the vendor thereafter remained only as lessee; mere tax-saving motive, unsupported by material, did not make the transaction a colourable device. Depreciation on the films was therefore allowed, and the Revenue failed on both issues.
Where liability to incur construction expenditure had already accrued under the business transaction, the Court applied the mercantile system and the Calcutta Company principle to allow deduction of the estimated expense on accrual basis; the concurrent finding permitting the construction deduction was upheld. In the sale-and-lease-back arrangement involving cinematographic rights, title had passed to the assessee and the vendor thereafter remained only as lessee; mere tax-saving motive, unsupported by material, did not make the transaction a colourable device. Depreciation on the films was therefore allowed, and the Revenue failed on both issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
