Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT deleted penalty for under-reporting of income under section 270A because the income had already been disclosed and was reflected through salary records, TDS and Form 26AS. The Tribunal noted that the addition arose from non-consideration of available material, while the appellate relief aligned the assessed income with the returned income. Once the quantum addition was deleted, the statutory condition for under-reporting ceased to exist, and there was no basis to infer concealment or misreporting. The consequential penalty therefore could not be sustained and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
ITAT deleted penalty for under-reporting of income under section 270A because the income had already been disclosed and was reflected through salary records, TDS and Form 26AS. The Tribunal noted that the addition arose from non-consideration of available material, while the appellate relief aligned the assessed income with the returned income. Once the quantum addition was deleted, the statutory condition for under-reporting ceased to exist, and there was no basis to infer concealment or misreporting. The consequential penalty therefore could not be sustained and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
