Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT deleted penalty for under-reporting of income under section 270A because the income had already been disclosed and was reflected through salary records, TDS and Form 26AS. The Tribunal noted that the addition arose from non-consideration of available material, while the appellate relief aligned the assessed income with the returned income. Once the quantum addition was deleted, the statutory condition for under-reporting ceased to exist, and there was no basis to infer concealment or misreporting. The consequential penalty therefore could not be sustained and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
ITAT deleted penalty for under-reporting of income under section 270A because the income had already been disclosed and was reflected through salary records, TDS and Form 26AS. The Tribunal noted that the addition arose from non-consideration of available material, while the appellate relief aligned the assessed income with the returned income. Once the quantum addition was deleted, the statutory condition for under-reporting ceased to exist, and there was no basis to infer concealment or misreporting. The consequential penalty therefore could not be sustained and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
