Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For computing limitation for a final assessment after DRP directions, the operative date is the date the directions are intimated and uploaded on the ITBA portal with DIN, because that upload constitutes communication and receipt by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that time should run only from later physical receipt of the directions. Applying that rule, the final assessment orders were passed beyond the prescribed period and were therefore time-barred and invalid. The orders were quashed, and the appeals were partly allowed, with other issues left open.
For computing limitation for a final assessment after DRP directions, the operative date is the date the directions are intimated and uploaded on the ITBA portal with DIN, because that upload constitutes communication and receipt by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that time should run only from later physical receipt of the directions. Applying that rule, the final assessment orders were passed beyond the prescribed period and were therefore time-barred and invalid. The orders were quashed, and the appeals were partly allowed, with other issues left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
