Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Limitation for section 201 proceedings turns on valid show-cause notice; information letters do not start proceedings, and time-bar applies.
    BSNL VRS compensation qualifies as retrenchment compensation, making the receipt exempt from tax subject to verification.
    Invalid jurisdiction in post-search assessment led the ITAT to quash the regular scrutiny assessment.
    Section 153C jurisdiction in search cases depends on handover date of seized material; assessment under section 143(3) was invalid.
    Reassessment beyond four years invalid where reasons lacked failure to disclose, reflected transactions, and sanction was absent.
    Faceless assessment notice must cover specific prejudicial variations; unexplained final additions without notice breach section 144B and natural just...
    Penalty under section 270A was premature where the quantum addition was remanded for fresh adjudication.
    Reassessment after search upheld, but additions on sale of investments deleted for lack of corroborated evidence and cross-examination.
    Mandatory DVO reference under stamp valuation rules defeated capital gains addition and barred post-assessment remand.
    Revenue expenditure and DTAA fixed base test: franchise fees upheld, while TDS issue was remanded for verification.
    Foreign contribution disclosed in the wrong schedule could not be taxed where the receipt was otherwise fully reported.
    Extraterritorial customs liability rejected for a foreign exporter; pre-amendment notices and proposed penalties were quashed.
    Mandatory regulatory timelines under customs broker licensing rules invalidated proceedings after late submission of the inquiry report.
    Mandatory revocation timelines under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations render delayed show cause notice and inquiry report invalid.
    Hearsay and uncorroborated evidence cannot prove smuggled gold; confiscation, penalty and seizure-based burden shifting failed.
    Sufficient cause for non-appearance leads to revival of restoration plea and fresh hearing after counsel's absence was found genuine.
    Project-specific CIRP in real estate insolvency confined claims and proceedings to one housing scheme.
    Restoration of confiscated property is premature before charges are framed and while the adjudication appeal remains pending.
    Special Economic Zone notified at Dholera, with Approval Committee constituted and customs depot status fixed from 9 April 2026
    Import restrictions on Glufosinate and its salts tightened under revised policy threshold for covered Chapter 38 tariff codes.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Transfer pricing controversy turned on the correct...

      Transfer pricing characterization and FAR analysis required fresh review before selecting the most appropriate method.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Income TaxApril 22, 2026Case LawsAT
      Transfer pricing controversy turned on the correct characterization of transactions between an LLP and its associated enterprise, the proper appreciation of their FAR profiles, and the resulting arm's length pricing analysis. The Tribunal noted that the revenue authorities had relied on assumptions about the entities' activities and risk allocation, while the assessee's claim of cost-to-cost reimbursement had not been tested against complete contemporaneous material, including financials, employee profile, contractual terms and risk assumption. It held that the basis for applying the Profit Split Method was insufficiently reasoned and required fresh examination. The assessment and DRP-backed adjustment were set aside and the matter was restored to the AO/TPO for de novo adjudication and a speaking order.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax