Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Additional evidence in appeal must be examined under Rule 112 before rejection of the appeal.
    Natural justice in GST adjudication: ex parte order on factual discrepancies set aside, with fresh hearing directed.
    Statutory right of appeal protected against coercive recovery pending expiry of the appeal period and pre-deposit requirements.
    Composite assessment orders for multiple financial years are unsustainable; separate proceedings must be initiated for each assessment year.
    Unsigned assessment order invalid; defective service defeats delay objection and fresh reassessment may follow after due notice.
    GST input tax credit distribution through tax invoices was permitted for reverse charge common services during the disputed period.
    Incriminating material and rural agricultural land sale: section 153C could not be used, and capital gains treatment failed.
    Section 153C satisfaction note must be recorded immediately after assessment completion; delayed notice was quashed as time-barred.
    Reasonable cause for non-filing of return by executors defeats penalty where probate was delayed after the assessee's death.
    Rejection of books without identifying defects is unsustainable; profit estimation based only on missing invoices was deleted.
    Jurisdiction under Section 127: absence of transfer order meant the assessment was quashed for lack of authority.
    Business expenditure and TDS disallowance principles applied to reimbursements, retainership fees, exempt income, and short deduction issues.
    Rectification order challenge not maintainable where grievance concerns the original addition, not the computation correction.
    Reassessment notice invalid for short response time, limitation breach, and unsustainable addition on joint property ownership.
    Duty drawback taxable on actual receipt; unconfronted portal data could not support addition or consequential penalty.
    Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where disputed claim was fully disclosed and only head of income was contested.
    Transfer pricing adjustment confined to international transactions; capacity, working capital and forex treatment directions sustained.
    Turnover under section 44AD prevents duplication of interest income addition where receipts were already disclosed.
    Functional comparability under TNMM: broadcasters excluded, software distributors included, and no separate interest on receivables after working capi...
    Third-party search material requires section 153C, and retracted survey statements need corroboration for additions.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Transfer pricing controversy turned on the correct...

      Transfer pricing characterization and FAR analysis required fresh review before selecting the most appropriate method.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Income TaxApril 22, 2026Case LawsAT
      Transfer pricing controversy turned on the correct characterization of transactions between an LLP and its associated enterprise, the proper appreciation of their FAR profiles, and the resulting arm's length pricing analysis. The Tribunal noted that the revenue authorities had relied on assumptions about the entities' activities and risk allocation, while the assessee's claim of cost-to-cost reimbursement had not been tested against complete contemporaneous material, including financials, employee profile, contractual terms and risk assumption. It held that the basis for applying the Profit Split Method was insufficiently reasoned and required fresh examination. The assessment and DRP-backed adjustment were set aside and the matter was restored to the AO/TPO for de novo adjudication and a speaking order.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax