Clean slate principle extinguishes uncrystallised operational claims and bars continuation of pending recovery and arbitral proceedings after plan app...
Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
HC held that a refund order was unsustainable where it granted refund but did not consider or decide the petitioners' separate claim for accrued interest. The absence of any finding or reason on the interest component showed non-application of mind and failure to pass a reasoned order on an independent claim. The Court did not decide entitlement to interest on merits; it remitted the interest claim for fresh consideration and adjudication in accordance with law, after granting a personal hearing and leaving all contentions open.
HC held that a refund order was unsustainable where it granted refund but did not consider or decide the petitioners' separate claim for accrued interest. The absence of any finding or reason on the interest component showed non-application of mind and failure to pass a reasoned order on an independent claim. The Court did not decide entitlement to interest on merits; it remitted the interest claim for fresh consideration and adjudication in accordance with law, after granting a personal hearing and leaving all contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.