Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
HC held that a refund order was unsustainable where it granted refund but did not consider or decide the petitioners' separate claim for accrued interest. The absence of any finding or reason on the interest component showed non-application of mind and failure to pass a reasoned order on an independent claim. The Court did not decide entitlement to interest on merits; it remitted the interest claim for fresh consideration and adjudication in accordance with law, after granting a personal hearing and leaving all contentions open.
HC held that a refund order was unsustainable where it granted refund but did not consider or decide the petitioners' separate claim for accrued interest. The absence of any finding or reason on the interest component showed non-application of mind and failure to pass a reasoned order on an independent claim. The Court did not decide entitlement to interest on merits; it remitted the interest claim for fresh consideration and adjudication in accordance with law, after granting a personal hearing and leaving all contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.