Genuineness of investment evidence determines LTCG entitlement; non specific regulatory reports cannot displace transaction specific documentary proof...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5881 to 5900 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that a refund order was unsustainable where it granted refund but did not consider or decide the petitioners' separate claim for accrued interest. The absence of any finding or reason on the interest component showed non-application of mind and failure to pass a reasoned order on an independent claim. The Court did not decide entitlement to interest on merits; it remitted the interest claim for fresh consideration and adjudication in accordance with law, after granting a personal hearing and leaving all contentions open.
HC held that a refund order was unsustainable where it granted refund but did not consider or decide the petitioners' separate claim for accrued interest. The absence of any finding or reason on the interest component showed non-application of mind and failure to pass a reasoned order on an independent claim. The Court did not decide entitlement to interest on merits; it remitted the interest claim for fresh consideration and adjudication in accordance with law, after granting a personal hearing and leaving all contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
