Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A subordinate adjudicating authority must follow an earlier appellate decision in the same matter unless it has been set aside by a superior court; mere disagreement with the reasoning or reliance on additional materials does not justify departure, so the impugned order was set aside for breach of judicial discipline. The imported track assembly, brake/case sub-assembly, gear vertical adjuster and bar seat track lock were integral seat-mechanism components supplied to seat manufacturers and were therefore classifiable as parts of seats under CTI 9401 90 00, not as parts and accessories of motor vehicles under CTI 8708 99 00. The reclassification was held erroneous and the assessee's classification was upheld.
A subordinate adjudicating authority must follow an earlier appellate decision in the same matter unless it has been set aside by a superior court; mere disagreement with the reasoning or reliance on additional materials does not justify departure, so the impugned order was set aside for breach of judicial discipline. The imported track assembly, brake/case sub-assembly, gear vertical adjuster and bar seat track lock were integral seat-mechanism components supplied to seat manufacturers and were therefore classifiable as parts of seats under CTI 9401 90 00, not as parts and accessories of motor vehicles under CTI 8708 99 00. The reclassification was held erroneous and the assessee's classification was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
