Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 29A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies where there is an operative SEBI order prohibiting a person from accessing the securities market or trading in securities. Because the appellant fell within the class covered by the 26.06.2018 SEBI prohibition, and that order had neither been set aside nor successfully challenged, the Adjudicating Authority was not required to examine its correctness or validity in insolvency proceedings. Authorities on Companies Act disqualification and moratorium-based recovery were inapplicable. The appellant was therefore ineligible to submit a resolution plan, and rejection of the application was upheld.
Section 29A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies where there is an operative SEBI order prohibiting a person from accessing the securities market or trading in securities. Because the appellant fell within the class covered by the 26.06.2018 SEBI prohibition, and that order had neither been set aside nor successfully challenged, the Adjudicating Authority was not required to examine its correctness or validity in insolvency proceedings. Authorities on Companies Act disqualification and moratorium-based recovery were inapplicable. The appellant was therefore ineligible to submit a resolution plan, and rejection of the application was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
