Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Section 29A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies where there is an operative SEBI order prohibiting a person from accessing the securities market or trading in securities. Because the appellant fell within the class covered by the 26.06.2018 SEBI prohibition, and that order had neither been set aside nor successfully challenged, the Adjudicating Authority was not required to examine its correctness or validity in insolvency proceedings. Authorities on Companies Act disqualification and moratorium-based recovery were inapplicable. The appellant was therefore ineligible to submit a resolution plan, and rejection of the application was upheld.
Section 29A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies where there is an operative SEBI order prohibiting a person from accessing the securities market or trading in securities. Because the appellant fell within the class covered by the 26.06.2018 SEBI prohibition, and that order had neither been set aside nor successfully challenged, the Adjudicating Authority was not required to examine its correctness or validity in insolvency proceedings. Authorities on Companies Act disqualification and moratorium-based recovery were inapplicable. The appellant was therefore ineligible to submit a resolution plan, and rejection of the application was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
