Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Approved resolution plans extinguish unsubmitted pre-approval tax claims, preventing later recovery outside the insolvency process and preserving a cl...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1241 to 1260 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 29A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies where there is an operative SEBI order prohibiting a person from accessing the securities market or trading in securities. Because the appellant fell within the class covered by the 26.06.2018 SEBI prohibition, and that order had neither been set aside nor successfully challenged, the Adjudicating Authority was not required to examine its correctness or validity in insolvency proceedings. Authorities on Companies Act disqualification and moratorium-based recovery were inapplicable. The appellant was therefore ineligible to submit a resolution plan, and rejection of the application was upheld.
Section 29A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies where there is an operative SEBI order prohibiting a person from accessing the securities market or trading in securities. Because the appellant fell within the class covered by the 26.06.2018 SEBI prohibition, and that order had neither been set aside nor successfully challenged, the Adjudicating Authority was not required to examine its correctness or validity in insolvency proceedings. Authorities on Companies Act disqualification and moratorium-based recovery were inapplicable. The appellant was therefore ineligible to submit a resolution plan, and rejection of the application was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
