Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Section 29A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies where there is an operative SEBI order prohibiting a person from accessing the securities market or trading in securities. Because the appellant fell within the class covered by the 26.06.2018 SEBI prohibition, and that order had neither been set aside nor successfully challenged, the Adjudicating Authority was not required to examine its correctness or validity in insolvency proceedings. Authorities on Companies Act disqualification and moratorium-based recovery were inapplicable. The appellant was therefore ineligible to submit a resolution plan, and rejection of the application was upheld.
Section 29A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies where there is an operative SEBI order prohibiting a person from accessing the securities market or trading in securities. Because the appellant fell within the class covered by the 26.06.2018 SEBI prohibition, and that order had neither been set aside nor successfully challenged, the Adjudicating Authority was not required to examine its correctness or validity in insolvency proceedings. Authorities on Companies Act disqualification and moratorium-based recovery were inapplicable. The appellant was therefore ineligible to submit a resolution plan, and rejection of the application was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
