Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Transfer pricing adjustment on AMP expenditure was deleted because the Bright Line Test could not be applied to determine arm's length price, following Delhi High Court and coordinate Bench precedent; the Tribunal held no adjustment was warranted on the assessee's AMP spend. The section 43B issue on bonus payment was not decided on merits and was remitted to verify whether the bonus was paid within the return-filing due date, in which case no addition would arise. Claims relating to short grant of self-assessment tax credit and deduction of interest on VAT duty were also restored for fresh examination. The appeal was thus partly allowed.
Transfer pricing adjustment on AMP expenditure was deleted because the Bright Line Test could not be applied to determine arm's length price, following Delhi High Court and coordinate Bench precedent; the Tribunal held no adjustment was warranted on the assessee's AMP spend. The section 43B issue on bonus payment was not decided on merits and was remitted to verify whether the bonus was paid within the return-filing due date, in which case no addition would arise. Claims relating to short grant of self-assessment tax credit and deduction of interest on VAT duty were also restored for fresh examination. The appeal was thus partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
