Faceless assessment notice must cover specific prejudicial variations; unexplained final additions without notice breach section 144B and natural just...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4021 to 4040 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing adjustment on AMP expenditure was deleted because the Bright Line Test could not be applied to determine arm's length price, following Delhi High Court and coordinate Bench precedent; the Tribunal held no adjustment was warranted on the assessee's AMP spend. The section 43B issue on bonus payment was not decided on merits and was remitted to verify whether the bonus was paid within the return-filing due date, in which case no addition would arise. Claims relating to short grant of self-assessment tax credit and deduction of interest on VAT duty were also restored for fresh examination. The appeal was thus partly allowed.
Transfer pricing adjustment on AMP expenditure was deleted because the Bright Line Test could not be applied to determine arm's length price, following Delhi High Court and coordinate Bench precedent; the Tribunal held no adjustment was warranted on the assessee's AMP spend. The section 43B issue on bonus payment was not decided on merits and was remitted to verify whether the bonus was paid within the return-filing due date, in which case no addition would arise. Claims relating to short grant of self-assessment tax credit and deduction of interest on VAT duty were also restored for fresh examination. The appeal was thus partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
