Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Recorded bank credits supported by books of account, confirmations, returns, ledgers and bank statements could not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A, because the assessee was not shown to be the owner of unrecorded money and the addition lacked corroborative evidence that the funds were undisclosed income. The deletion of the addition, including the cash deposit component, was upheld. Reassessment also failed because the recorded reasons rested on incorrect facts: the assessee was said to have three bank accounts and higher non-cash credits, but verification showed only one bank account and the alleged information was wrong. The section 148 notice and reassessment proceedings were therefore held unsustainable.
Recorded bank credits supported by books of account, confirmations, returns, ledgers and bank statements could not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A, because the assessee was not shown to be the owner of unrecorded money and the addition lacked corroborative evidence that the funds were undisclosed income. The deletion of the addition, including the cash deposit component, was upheld. Reassessment also failed because the recorded reasons rested on incorrect facts: the assessee was said to have three bank accounts and higher non-cash credits, but verification showed only one bank account and the alleged information was wrong. The section 148 notice and reassessment proceedings were therefore held unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
