Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 96508 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recorded bank credits supported by books of account, confirmations, returns, ledgers and bank statements could not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A, because the assessee was not shown to be the owner of unrecorded money and the addition lacked corroborative evidence that the funds were undisclosed income. The deletion of the addition, including the cash deposit component, was upheld. Reassessment also failed because the recorded reasons rested on incorrect facts: the assessee was said to have three bank accounts and higher non-cash credits, but verification showed only one bank account and the alleged information was wrong. The section 148 notice and reassessment proceedings were therefore held unsustainable.
Recorded bank credits supported by books of account, confirmations, returns, ledgers and bank statements could not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A, because the assessee was not shown to be the owner of unrecorded money and the addition lacked corroborative evidence that the funds were undisclosed income. The deletion of the addition, including the cash deposit component, was upheld. Reassessment also failed because the recorded reasons rested on incorrect facts: the assessee was said to have three bank accounts and higher non-cash credits, but verification showed only one bank account and the alleged information was wrong. The section 148 notice and reassessment proceedings were therefore held unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
