Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Recorded bank credits supported by books of account, confirmations, returns, ledgers and bank statements could not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A, because the assessee was not shown to be the owner of unrecorded money and the addition lacked corroborative evidence that the funds were undisclosed income. The deletion of the addition, including the cash deposit component, was upheld. Reassessment also failed because the recorded reasons rested on incorrect facts: the assessee was said to have three bank accounts and higher non-cash credits, but verification showed only one bank account and the alleged information was wrong. The section 148 notice and reassessment proceedings were therefore held unsustainable.
Recorded bank credits supported by books of account, confirmations, returns, ledgers and bank statements could not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A, because the assessee was not shown to be the owner of unrecorded money and the addition lacked corroborative evidence that the funds were undisclosed income. The deletion of the addition, including the cash deposit component, was upheld. Reassessment also failed because the recorded reasons rested on incorrect facts: the assessee was said to have three bank accounts and higher non-cash credits, but verification showed only one bank account and the alleged information was wrong. The section 148 notice and reassessment proceedings were therefore held unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
