Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Deduction for gratuity actually paid under section 43B was allowed because the assessee substantiated actual payment with audited financial statements, actuarial provision entries, profit and loss account debit, gratuity disclosures, and supporting ledger and salary records. The Tribunal held that the evidentiary record proved payment to the relevant employees and that the disallowance based on alleged absence of proof was factually unsustainable. The deletion of the disallowance was therefore upheld and the claim for deduction was allowed.
Deduction for gratuity actually paid under section 43B was allowed because the assessee substantiated actual payment with audited financial statements, actuarial provision entries, profit and loss account debit, gratuity disclosures, and supporting ledger and salary records. The Tribunal held that the evidentiary record proved payment to the relevant employees and that the disallowance based on alleged absence of proof was factually unsustainable. The deletion of the disallowance was therefore upheld and the claim for deduction was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.