Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Deduction for gratuity actually paid under section 43B was allowed because the assessee substantiated actual payment with audited financial statements, actuarial provision entries, profit and loss account debit, gratuity disclosures, and supporting ledger and salary records. The Tribunal held that the evidentiary record proved payment to the relevant employees and that the disallowance based on alleged absence of proof was factually unsustainable. The deletion of the disallowance was therefore upheld and the claim for deduction was allowed.
Deduction for gratuity actually paid under section 43B was allowed because the assessee substantiated actual payment with audited financial statements, actuarial provision entries, profit and loss account debit, gratuity disclosures, and supporting ledger and salary records. The Tribunal held that the evidentiary record proved payment to the relevant employees and that the disallowance based on alleged absence of proof was factually unsustainable. The deletion of the disallowance was therefore upheld and the claim for deduction was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.