Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1481 to 1500 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Delay in filing a statutory GST appeal was condoned in writ jurisdiction where the assessee showed that non-filing within time was due to circumstances beyond its control. The Court held that, although the Appellate Authority is bound by the limitation under Section 107 of the RGST/CGST Act, refusal to permit consideration on merits in such circumstances would cause grave prejudice. The delay was therefore condoned and the Appellate Authority was directed to entertain and decide the appeal on merits. The challenge to the vires of Section 107(4) read with the notification was not pressed and was left open.
Delay in filing a statutory GST appeal was condoned in writ jurisdiction where the assessee showed that non-filing within time was due to circumstances beyond its control. The Court held that, although the Appellate Authority is bound by the limitation under Section 107 of the RGST/CGST Act, refusal to permit consideration on merits in such circumstances would cause grave prejudice. The delay was therefore condoned and the Appellate Authority was directed to entertain and decide the appeal on merits. The challenge to the vires of Section 107(4) read with the notification was not pressed and was left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.