Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1541 to 1560 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Expenditure relating to a discontinued business remained allowable where the assessee had separately disclosed the operation, revenue, expenses and loss in audited financial statements and notes to accounts, and the Assessing Officer had found no item to be unvouched, unsupported or not for business purposes. The Tribunal held that such loss could not be curtailed on a proportionate basis merely because the common expenses were not submitted to the slump sale valuer. The valuation report was relevant only for capital gains computation and did not govern deductibility under section 37(1). The Revenue's challenge failed and the deletion of the disallowance was upheld.
Expenditure relating to a discontinued business remained allowable where the assessee had separately disclosed the operation, revenue, expenses and loss in audited financial statements and notes to accounts, and the Assessing Officer had found no item to be unvouched, unsupported or not for business purposes. The Tribunal held that such loss could not be curtailed on a proportionate basis merely because the common expenses were not submitted to the slump sale valuer. The valuation report was relevant only for capital gains computation and did not govern deductibility under section 37(1). The Revenue's challenge failed and the deletion of the disallowance was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.