Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
Expenditure relating to a discontinued business remained allowable where the assessee had separately disclosed the operation, revenue, expenses and loss in audited financial statements and notes to accounts, and the Assessing Officer had found no item to be unvouched, unsupported or not for business purposes. The Tribunal held that such loss could not be curtailed on a proportionate basis merely because the common expenses were not submitted to the slump sale valuer. The valuation report was relevant only for capital gains computation and did not govern deductibility under section 37(1). The Revenue's challenge failed and the deletion of the disallowance was upheld.
Expenditure relating to a discontinued business remained allowable where the assessee had separately disclosed the operation, revenue, expenses and loss in audited financial statements and notes to accounts, and the Assessing Officer had found no item to be unvouched, unsupported or not for business purposes. The Tribunal held that such loss could not be curtailed on a proportionate basis merely because the common expenses were not submitted to the slump sale valuer. The valuation report was relevant only for capital gains computation and did not govern deductibility under section 37(1). The Revenue's challenge failed and the deletion of the disallowance was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.