Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An appeal withdrawn after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme was restored because the earlier dismissal was only on withdrawal and not on merits. The Tribunal's refusal to revive the appeal was set aside, as the dispute remained undecided and substantial payment had already been made under the settlement scheme. Restoration was necessary so the appeal could be heard in accordance with law, and so the assessee could, if advised, pursue settlement again under the prevailing scheme while the appeal remained pending. The appeal was therefore revived for disposal on merits.
An appeal withdrawn after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme was restored because the earlier dismissal was only on withdrawal and not on merits. The Tribunal's refusal to revive the appeal was set aside, as the dispute remained undecided and substantial payment had already been made under the settlement scheme. Restoration was necessary so the appeal could be heard in accordance with law, and so the assessee could, if advised, pursue settlement again under the prevailing scheme while the appeal remained pending. The appeal was therefore revived for disposal on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
