Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Approved resolution plans extinguish unsubmitted pre-approval tax claims, preventing later recovery outside the insolvency process and preserving a cl...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1241 to 1260 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Attachment of property under PMLA is discussed in the context of alleged proceeds of crime arising from scheduled offences, where the Adjudicating Authority issued a show cause notice on the basis of the original complaint, relied-upon documents and statements under section 50, and later confirmed the provisional attachment. The appeals were carried to the Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA. A specific contention noted in the source is that attachment of property acquired before 01-07-2005, the commencement of PMLA, is not valid in law; the Tribunal is stated to have dealt with that issue along with the other grounds raised.
Attachment of property under PMLA is discussed in the context of alleged proceeds of crime arising from scheduled offences, where the Adjudicating Authority issued a show cause notice on the basis of the original complaint, relied-upon documents and statements under section 50, and later confirmed the provisional attachment. The appeals were carried to the Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA. A specific contention noted in the source is that attachment of property acquired before 01-07-2005, the commencement of PMLA, is not valid in law; the Tribunal is stated to have dealt with that issue along with the other grounds raised.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
