Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Attachment of property under PMLA is discussed in the context of alleged proceeds of crime arising from scheduled offences, where the Adjudicating Authority issued a show cause notice on the basis of the original complaint, relied-upon documents and statements under section 50, and later confirmed the provisional attachment. The appeals were carried to the Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA. A specific contention noted in the source is that attachment of property acquired before 01-07-2005, the commencement of PMLA, is not valid in law; the Tribunal is stated to have dealt with that issue along with the other grounds raised.
Attachment of property under PMLA is discussed in the context of alleged proceeds of crime arising from scheduled offences, where the Adjudicating Authority issued a show cause notice on the basis of the original complaint, relied-upon documents and statements under section 50, and later confirmed the provisional attachment. The appeals were carried to the Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA. A specific contention noted in the source is that attachment of property acquired before 01-07-2005, the commencement of PMLA, is not valid in law; the Tribunal is stated to have dealt with that issue along with the other grounds raised.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
